Hobbesian Internationalism, 1st ed. 2019 Anarchy, Authority and the Fate of Political Philosophy International Political Theory Series

This book sets out to re-examine the foundations of Thomas Hobbes?s political philosophy, and to develop a Hobbesian normative theory of international relations. Its central thesis is that two concepts ? anarchy and authority ? constitute the core of Hobbes's political philosophy whose aim is to justify the state. The Hobbesian state is a type of authority  (juridical, public, coercive, and supreme) which emerges under conditions of anarchy ('state of nature'). A state-of-nature argument makes a difference because it justifies authority without appeal to moral obligation. The book shows that the closest analogue of a Hobbesian authority in international relations is Kant's confederation of free states, where states enjoy 'anarchical' (equal) freedom. At present, this crucial form of freedom is being threatened by economic processes of globalisation, and by the resurgence of private authority across state borders.

PART I. Authority

Chapter 1. Reading Hobbes as a Theorist of Anarchy and Authority

Chapter 2. Authority and the Problem of Political Philosophy

PART II.  Anarchy

Chapter 3. The State of Nature in The Elements

Chapter 4. The State of Nature in De Cive

Chapter 5. The State of Nature in Leviathan

PART III. Hobbes’s Theory of International Relations

Chapter 6. Hobbes and the International Anarchy

Chapter 7. Hobbesian Internationalism: Hobbes Meets Kant

Chapter 8. Challenges: Globalisation and the Resurgence of Private Authority

Silviya Lechner was Assistant Professor and is currently a senior visiting research fellow at King’s College London, UK. She specialises in social and political philosophy, theory of action, and international political theory. She is the co-author of Practice Theory and International Relations (with M. Frost, 2018).

Shows that Hobbes's political philosophy can illuminate contemporary philosophical debates on the character of political authority and obligation

Defends a structuralist explanation of the state of nature as a set of external relations between free and equal agents

Offers a comparative analysis of Hobbes’s accounts of morality in The Elements, De Cive, and Leviathan